(a) $\mu_{1} = 1.20 + \frac{0.8 \times 10^{- 14}}{\left( 400 \times 10^{- 9} \right)^{2}}$
Or $\mu_{1} = 1.20 + \frac{0.8 \times 10^{- 14}}{400 \times 400 \times 10^{- 18}}$
Or $\mu_{1} = 1.20 + \frac{0.8}{16}$
Or $\mu_{1} = 1.20 + 0.05$
Or $\ \mu_{1} = 1.25$
Or $\ \ \sin{i_{c} = \frac{1}{1.25} = 0.8}$
Or $i_{c} = 53.13{^\circ}$
Again,${\ \ \mu}_{2} = 1.20 + \frac{0.8 \times 10^{- 14}}{\left( 500 \times 10^{- 9} \right)^{2}}$
[image:9_image85.jpeg]
Or $\ \mu_{2} = 1.20 + \frac{0.8}{25}$ or $\mu_{2} = 1.20 + 0.32$
Or ${\ \mu}_{2} = 1.232$
Or $\sin{i_{c} = \frac{1}{1.232} = 0.81}$
Or $\ i_{c} = \sin^{- 1}{0.81}$
$= 54.26{^\circ}$
Now,${\ \ sin}{\theta = 0.8\ or\ \theta = 53.13{^\circ}}$
This angle is clearly greater than critical angle corresponding to wavelength 400 nm. So, light of 400 nm wavelength under goes total internal reflection